What genetics can (and can’t) tell us about educational inequality
Recent research allows us to ask new questions about how children differ in their educational development and what this does – and does not - mean for schools.
Recent research allows us to ask new questions about how children differ in their educational development and what this does – and does not - mean for schools.
This post brings together some of the “greatest hits” from across the project, highlighting a selection of the findings that stood out most over the course of the research.
This post outlines the findings from a new paper looking at England's former Gifted and Talented programme. Who was identified as gifted and talented, and what difference did it make to their education and later life?
Using predicted grades and results submitted by 740 schools, we explore differences between predicted and actual grades, including variations by subject
We talk you through some new measures in FFT Aspire, designed to make sense of Key Stage 4 attainment in the absence of Key Stage 2 data.
We look at the routes students are currently taking through post-16 education and what this can tell us about the students who might take V-Levels in the future.
We explore the technical and design challenges of creating genuinely useful diagnostic tests.
We bring you the highlights from Nuffield-funded research into Key Stage 2 mathematics sub-domain scores - and whether it is possible to produce scores that are genuinely useful to teachers and schools.
80% of pupils currently achieve the phonics standard by the end of Year 1. We look at how challenging it will be to reach 90%.